|
|
|
White =
Site
Links - Grey = Other Websites - Teal = PDF's
11/21/24
They
Forced The SCOTUS To Vote On
Trump's Presidential
Immunity. Now, They Are All
Saying Trump Is Going To
"Put Them In Jail." Why Is
That? Because They Realize
That They May Not Have
Political Immunity To Hide
Behind Anymore. I Had
Mentioned How This Move To
Question Trump's
Presidential Immunity May
Back-Fire On Them. Well... I
Believe It Did. The SCOTUS
Did Not Change ANYTHING In
The Presidential Immunity
Clause, But They Did Define
It.
Saying
Presidential, Or Official
Acts & Personal, Not
Official, Are Two Separate
Things. Each One Needs To Be
Defined To Be Questioned.
Signing Presidential Orders
Of War, Making Decisions
That May Affect Others,
Including Other Countries.
Any Decision That Is
Presidential, Protects The
President. If He Uses His
Powers To Enrich Himself...
(Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi)
That Is Personal And Is NOT
Covered Under Presidential
Immunity.
Now The
Question Will Become... Is
Political Immunity Now The
Same?
Political
Vs Personal?
I Think We
Are About To Find Out.
DECISION
IMMUNITY MOTION - PDF
JULY
01, 2024
SCOTUS
ARGUMENTS
April
25th, 2024
Will
Sovereign
Immunity Be
The Next One
Challenged?
There Are A
Lot Of
Different
Immunity's
They Hide
Behind,
Including
Charities And
Non Profits.
Ever Wonder
Why There Seems To Be
All Sorts Of
"Hearings" But No One
Is
Ever Held Accountable?
MTG And The
Republicans Tell Us
They Can Now Make
Committees
To "Go After
People" For Jan 6th
And Other Wrongs, But
You Should
Know,
They Cannot Go After
Anyone Who Is A
Politician. Nancy
Pelosi Used
Sovereign
Immunity For
Her Role In The Jan
6th Issues That She
Helped Create.
No One
Can Bring Charges
Against Her For
Refusing The Guards
That Day. And
MSM
Sure Isn't Going To
Tell You She Is Using
Sovereign
Immunity To Keep Her
Story
Quiet. The Fake
Committee Went After
Bannon, Who Is
Not A Politician.
They
Went After Trump's
Family As Well. Trump
Was Subpoenaed. He
Didn't
Bother
With It. He Also
Enjoys The Same
Privilege.
If
MTG Holds Her
Hearings, Don't
Expect Much From
Witnesses Who Hold
Office.
If They Do Show Up,
They Will Probably
Take The 5th. However,
Some Of
The
People I Expect To Be
Subpoenaed Could Be
Ray Epps, DC Police,
News
Reporters,
Ashley's Killer,
Michael Leroy Bird,
And John Sullivan To
Name A Few.
Of
Course Fake News
Probably Won't
Broadcast These Hearings.
Lets
Take A Look At
ALL The
Immunity's
People Enjoy.
There Is A
Long List.
.Legal Immunity - the concept of a person or entity being immune from
legal
liability
due to special
status
. Absolute
Immunity
-
a type of
immunity for
government
officials that
confers
total
immunity when
acting in the
course of
their duties.
. Amnesty
Law
-
a law that
provides
amnesty for
past crimes
. Charitable Immunity
-
immunity from liability granted to charities in many
countries from
the 19th
century to the
mid 20th
century.
. Diplomatic
Immunity -
agreement
between of
sovereign
governments to
exclude
diplomats from
local laws
.
Immunity
From
Prosecution
-
(International
Law) - exclusion
of governments
or their
offices from
prosecution
under
international
law
.
Judicial
Immunity
-
immunity of a
judge or
magistrate in
the course of
their
official
duties
.
Parliamentary
Immunity
- immunity
granted to
elected
officials during
their
tenure
and in the
course of their
duties
.
Qualified
Immunity
-
in the United
States, immunity
of individuals
performing
tasks as
part of
the government's
actions
.
Sovereign
Immunity
-
the prevention
of lawsuits or
prosecution
against rulers
of
governments
without their
given consent
.
Sovereign
Immunity In
The United
States
-
the legal
privilege by
which the
American
federal, state,
and tribal
governments
cannot be sued
.
Spousal Immunity -
also called
spousal
immunity,
protects a
spouse from
testifying
against
the defendant
.
State
Immunity
-
principle of
international
law that the
government of a
state
is not
amenable
before the
courts of
another state
.
Witness
Immunity
- immunity
granted to a
witness in
exchange for
testimony
I
Need To Look Into That
Charitable
Immunity.
The Clinton Foundation
Comes To Mind. But For
Now,
We'll Take A Look At
The Two Immunity's
That Seems To Be
Protecting The Swamp
Absolute Immunity - a type of immunity for
government
officials that
confers total
immunity when
acting in the
course of
their duties.
Qualified
Immunity - in the United States, immunity of individuals
performing
tasks as part
of the
government's
actions
Absolute And
Qualified
Immunity
Absolute
Immunity Explained
In
The United States law,
state, federal and tribal
governments generally
enjoy immunity from
lawsuits. Local
governments typically
enjoy immunity from some
forms of suit,
particularly in tort
In the US,
sovereign immunity falls
into two categories
Absolute
Immunity - pursuant to
which a government actor
may not be sued for the
allegedly wrongful act,
even if that person acted
maliciously or in bad
faith. and:
Qualified
Immunity - pursuant
to which a government
actor is shielded from
liability only in specific
conditions are met, as
specified in statute or
case law.
In
some situations,
sovereign immunity may
have been waived by
law.
Federal
Sovereign Immunity
The
federal
government of the
United States has
sovereign immunity and may
not be sued anywhere in
the United States unless
it has waived its immunity
or consented to suit. The
United States has waived
sovereign immunity to a
limited extent, mainly
through the Federal
Tort Claims Act,
which waives the immunity
if a tortious act of a
federal employee causes
damage, and the Tucker
Act, which
waives the immunity over
claims arising out of
contracts to which the
federal government is a
party.The United States as
a sovereign is immune from
suit unless it
unequivocally consents to
being sued.The
United States Supreme
Court in Price
v. United States observed:
"It is an axiom of our
jurisprudence. The
government is not liable
to suit unless it consents
thereto, and its liability
in suit cannot be extended
beyond the plain language
of the statute authorizing
it." Price
v. United States,
174 U.S. 373, 375-76
(1899) Interesting That
This Was The Only Video I
Could Find On This
Subject.
State
Sovereign Immunity
we
have understood the
Eleventh Amendment to
stand not so much for
what it says, but for
the presupposition of
our constitutional
structure which it
confirms: that the
States entered the
federal system with
their sovereignty
intact; that the
judicial authority in
Article III is limited
by this sovereignty, and
that a State will
therefore not be subject
to suit in federal court
unless it has consented
to suit, either
expressly or in the
"plan of the
convention". [Citations
omitted.]
Additionally,
Congress can abrogate
state sovereign immunity
when it acts pursuant to
powers delegated to it
by any amendments
ratified after the
Eleventh Amendment. The abrogation
doctrine,
established by the
Supreme Court in
Fitzpatrick
v. Bitzer (1976),
is most often implicated
in cases that involve
Section 5 of the
Fourteenth
Amendment,
which explicitly allows
Congress to enforce its
guarantees on the
states.
Legal
Dictionary -
Sovereign Immunity -
LINK
Qualified Immunity
Explained
What Is Qualified
Immunity And How May
Lawmakers Change It?
And Because We All
Know How They Hide
Their Money
Charitable Immunity
Charitable Immunity
Presidential
Immunity
Although
the U.S.
president is
sued daily in
his
governmental
capacity, he
normally is
not sued in
his personal
capacity as
being
personally
liable.
In
1982, the
Supreme Court
held in
Nixon v. Fitzgerald
that the president enjoys absolute immunity from civil
litigation for
official acts
undertaken
while he or
she is
president.
The
Court
suggested that
this immunity
was broad
(though not
limitless),
applying to
acts within
the "outer
perimeter" of
the
president's
official
duties.Fifteen
years after Fitzgerald,
the Supreme
Court held in
Clinton v. Jones that the president does not possess absolute immunity
from civil
litigation
surrounding
acts he
carried out
that were not
part of his
official
duties (which
is often
incorrectly
presented as
referring only
to acts
carried out
before
becoming
president).
The
2020 Supreme
Court decision
in Trump v. Vance held
that the
president is
subject to
subpoenas in
criminal
prosecutions
for personal
conduct with
the same legal
threshold as
anyone else.
Immunity From
Prosecution
Can I Be Forced To
Testify Against My
Spouse?
Immunity For The
Vatican On Sexual
Abuse Cases
Crimes Against Humanity
Sexual Offenses
Against Children -
Criminal Law
Besucherzähler
einbinden
|
|
|
| Conservapedia
|
|
|
